Problem with method description 978.17, and 951.41

Published in: 1997

April 12, 1997

 

Excerpt:

During the course of fmishing the 20-year review article I am writing on use of the isotope ratio procedure, I have become aware of what is apparently a fairly widespread international misinterpretation of the sentence at the end of Alternative I: “Samples with a d-13C value less negative than -23.5°/00 are considered to contain com and/or cane sugars only after confirmation with the internal standard isotope ratio method 991.41 fl. The erroneous interpretation of this is that samples MORE negative need have no further testing.

 

Download a PDF file of the full article

(Most of the PDF files are 1-2 Mb in size and will take a while to download)


Contact

National Honey Board
11409 Business Park Cir
Suite 210
Firestone, CO 80504

E-mail: honey@nhb.org
Fax: 303.776.1177
Tel.: 303.776.2337